
The August 2024 NAR settlement changed how buyer agent compensation is communicated -- but the practical reality for most St. Louis sellers is less dramatic than the headlines suggested. Here is what actually changed, what did not, and what sellers need to know before they list.
Before the settlement, seller-offered buyer agent compensation was published in the MLS and was a standard part of how listings were marketed. After the settlement, two things changed:
What did not change: sellers can still offer to pay buyer agent compensation as part of the transaction, and many do.
In the St. Louis market, the practical effect has been limited. Most sellers continue to offer buyer agent compensation because it expands the buyer pool and reduces friction in the transaction. The conversation has shifted from an automatic MLS publication to a negotiated term, but the outcome in most transactions is similar.
Sellers who offer zero buyer agent compensation do see their buyer pool narrow. Buyers with signed buyer representation agreements are contractually obligated to pay their agent if the seller does not -- and many buyers, particularly first-time buyers, cannot absorb that additional cost on top of a down payment and closing costs. This reduces the number of qualified buyers who will submit offers.
The current market norm in St. Louis for buyer agent compensation, when offered by the seller, runs 2.5% to 3% of the sale price. On a $250,000 home, that is $6,250 to $7,500.
Factors that affect whether to offer, and how much:
Total commission in St. Louis post-settlement typically still runs 5% to 7%, structured as the listing agent's fee plus the buyer agent compensation. The way it is documented and communicated has changed; the overall cost to sellers in most transactions has not changed significantly.
Since August 2024, buyer agents must have a signed written representation agreement before showing a home. These agreements specify how the buyer agent will be compensated. Sellers interacting with represented buyers should understand that:
Some buyers, particularly investors or experienced repeat buyers, will approach sellers without representation. In these cases, no buyer agent compensation is owed to anyone. However, unrepresented buyers may negotiate harder, are more likely to be sophisticated about pricing, and remove the intermediary that often facilitates a smoother transaction process. There are legitimate reasons to work with an unrepresented buyer -- and reasons to be cautious.
Missouri allows dual agency -- where one agent represents both the buyer and seller in the same transaction. Sellers should understand that in a dual agency situation, the agent cannot fully advocate for either party. This arrangement requires disclosure and written consent. The commission structure in dual agency transactions is negotiable.
Does the seller still pay the buyer's agent in Missouri?
After the August 2024 NAR settlement, sellers are no longer required to offer buyer agent compensation and cannot publish it in the MLS. However, many St. Louis sellers continue to offer it because doing so expands the buyer pool and reduces friction. Whether to offer it and how much is now a negotiated decision rather than an automatic standard.
What happens if a seller offers zero buyer agent compensation?
Buyers with signed representation agreements are contractually required to pay their agent if the seller does not. This creates a financial barrier for many buyers -- particularly first-time buyers who cannot absorb additional out-of-pocket costs. Sellers who offer no compensation may see their buyer pool narrow, particularly in lower price ranges.
How much buyer agent compensation should a St. Louis seller offer?
The current norm in St. Louis when sellers offer buyer agent compensation runs 2.5% to 3% of the sale price. The right amount depends on price point, market conditions, and property characteristics. In lower price ranges and slower market conditions, offering competitive compensation matters more for attracting qualified buyers.
Did the NAR settlement reduce total commission costs for sellers?
In most transactions, no -- not significantly. Total commission in St. Louis still typically runs 5 to 7 percent. The settlement changed how compensation is communicated and documented, not the underlying economics of a transaction that requires agent representation on both sides.
Questions about what you are reading? I answer personally -- no team, no handoff.